The Raglan Club executive have still not released a feasibility study on their proposal to sell the club’s premises. In early August the Club executive called a Special General Meeting for the 27th August for members to consider a motion to sell the premises and develop a new building at the Bowling Club site.
Even though the bowling club proposal is fraught with difficulties, as it is the Living Zone. The District Plan’s Living Zone places tight limits on commercial development, types of events and permitted noise. While the Bowling Club operates under a historical authority, this provision would not apply to a new development.
Members frustrated by the secrecy of the Raglan Club executive have come up with their own proposals. Andreas Broering and local architectural designer Alice Gironella have come up with their own plans for a Bow Street shopping development in front of the existing club building up to the Bow St Gallery. Andreas has also asked the Raglan Community Board to ensure that whatever happens in Bow Street is good for the town. The Board has asked the Club President to meet with them and explain what is proposed.
Andreas Broring, a Club member for over 30 years, said:
There has been very little information or alternative options been made available leaving Club members and the greater community in the dark. Why not offer the members to vote on the following proposals?
Concept 1:
The Club outlines to it’s members a commercial building development involving a mix of retail and office spaces along it’s Bow Street frontage, concept drawings are available. The Club asks for members who are interested to invest money by secured debentures at a return of 3.5% above current mortgage rates or 8% whichever the higher. There has already been a strong interest for further shops and office space and potential tenants have registered their interest in writing. A building committee would need to be formed and a proper due diligence undertaken to assess the building costs, time frame and response of the Raglan community. A conservative estimate of this proposal in terms of benefit for the Club is:
A rental revenue of around $ 200000 per annum with interest payment costs towards investing members of around $75000 leaving the Club with a financial surplus of about $ 125000 per annum.
The down side of this proposal is:
The Club undertakes the development and carries a certain risk, as any developer does, the gratification, say revenue of money is delayed until a completion of the project, some money needs to be spend first to set up a legal framework and additional management is needed to look after rental property.
The upside is:
The Club retains its property, does not have to leave its current site, can borrow monies from banks easier as it can show a steady rental income and gains a long term investment that will support financial shortfalls in it’s day to day trading.Concept 2:
The Club accepts an offer by a group of local developers to sell the Bow Street road frontage for up to $1000000( One Million) or $1000 per square meter. The developers grant access to the Club premises from Bow Street. The Club gives right of way via it’s Wallis Street entrance, allows for the development to start while the subdivision process is under way, the developers pay for all subdivision costs. The Club gives permission to demolish the covered entrance on the Bow Street side and relocate it’s entrance towards the Eastern side of the building. The Club agrees to let one of the outside smoker’s spaces to be demolished to allow courtyard and development space.
The developers enter into a lease for the use of carparking with the Club during daytime hours to a value of up to $50000 per annum.
The developers pay $250000 on acceptance of this proposal.
Downside:
The Club parts with a valuable part of its assets and loses some road frontage appeal
Upside:
The Club gets a healthy cash injection and money upfront and without delay to overcome current financial difficulties, additional funds can be used to upgrade the Club’s premises, undertake urgent repairs to the roof and kitchen ect..
The developers warrant to consult their proposed development with the Raglan Community Board and work along side the Raglan Naurally Recommendations.
Any potential risk factors lie with the developers and not the Club.Concept 3:
The Club takes a financially substancial offer from a community based organisation, in money figures aroud as much as concept 4. The Club vacates it’s site within an agreeable timeframe and relocates to a new location.
Downside:
The Club has to vacate it’s site and find new premises, a task not without challenges and rather unlikely to match what it is walking away from.
Upside:
A substantial amount of money to be invested into new Club rooms.
The former Club premises will be used for a community based organisation that does a lot of good for it’s community.Concept 4:
The Club goes ahead with the sale of the entire Club premise as decided by the former Executive Committee before the last AGM. The Club will be sold for around 3.9 Million Dollar plus a house on Cliff Street with a potential value of around 1.1Million Dollar. So the combined money value for the Club is around 5 Million Dollar. The buyer will allows the Club a certain time frame to continue operating from it’s current site, the buyer allows the Club to demolish the Club rooms at the end of that term and take with them and utilize whatever the Club sees fit. The intended future use of the Club site is the establishment of a major supermarket most likely under the “Fresh Choice” Brand.
Downside:
The Club will lose its site at Bow Street, there is a great amount of uncertainty as to where the Club can successfully move to and replicate what it is leaving behind, the developer for the then vacant Bow Street site has not given any details yet as to how this development would take shape and has not indicated that they would want to stay within guidelines established by the Raglan Community Board and Raglan Naturally. This new Supermarket development has potentially negative effects on a large part of the Raglan Business Community,So here we go, MEMBERS, We all own this Club and we all have the right to be fully informed of all the possibilities that have been presented to the Executive Committee over the past few month. Over 100 of our members have signed a petition that was delivered to the Club on the 13th of August 2017 asking for a Special General Meeting to allow an open and honest process when it comes to the future of our Club and to show open and transparent any proposal and or agreement that the Executive Committee has received and /or signed to date.
Potential relocation venues for the new Raglan Club site are uncertain, both suggestions: the Orca and the Raglan Bowling grounds face difficult and lengthy permit processes and might not be suitable at all. Unless permission to relocate to a new site has been granted in all aspects by local authorities a vote on the sale of the entire Raglan Club site should not even be presented to us Members!
At this point members are not allowed to view the Sale and Purchase agreement that was signed by the Executive in favor of Concept 4, and yet members are expected and asked by the President of the Club to vote in favor of it at the meeting scheduled for the 27th of August.
I have written this summary of concepts to the best of my knowledge and based on information that I have gathered over the past few month. There might be some errors in it, however they would be unintentional. As the Executive Committee is very secretive on the whole subject and keeps its members pretty much in the dark about it’s intentions and motives, this is about the best I can do.
Hi Rodger, would you like to put onto your website that the majority of special meeting attending club members voted against the sale of the club premises by show of hands. Cheers Andreas